|
ARMY AIR FORCES
HEADQUARTERS
AIR XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COMMAND
MATERIEL
EGN/elb
WRIGHT FIELD, DAYTON, OHIO
14 February 1947
IN REPLY ADDRESS BOTH
COMMUNICATION AND EN-
VELOPE TO ATTENTION OF
FOLLOWING OFFICE SYMBOL:
TSEOP .
Central Aircraft Corporation,
501 Fifth Avenue,
New York 17, New York.
Gentlemen:
This Command wishes to thank you for your letter of
17 January 1947 and inclosure thereto in which you described
three airplane designs, a Jet Fighter, an Attack Airplane, and
a High Speed Utility Twin Jet Airplane. It was indicated in
your letter that a review of these preliminary design studies
was desired.
Your designs have been carefully studied insofar as
possible consistent with the data furnished. It appears that
the designs are all based on the Burnelli "lifting fuselage"
which has been previously submitted and evaluated by this
Command. It further appears that the new features of this
design consist principally of adapting jet type engines to the
lifting type fuselage. While many advantages may be claimed
for this combination of lifting fuselage with jet engines,
the principle benefits claimed with lifting type fuselage
design have been achieved on AAF aircraft by use of stream-
lined bodies upon which low drag rather than high lift has
been emphasized. It is to be further pointed out that the
lifting type fuselage has a relatively low critical speed
which definitely limits the future development of this type
airplane. Such limitation is not desirable in view o the AAF
requirements for extremely high speed aircraft.
In view of recent severe cuts in AAF appropriations
and after due consideration, it have been determined the sub-
mitted designs do not establish sufficient basis for re-
commending contractual action to further exploit your designs.
Your continued interest in AAF matters is appreciated.
Very Truly Yours
S.R. BRENTNALL,
Colonel, Air Corps,
Chief, Engineering Operations
Engineering Division.
".... It is to be further pointed out that the
lifting type fuselage has a relatively low critical speed
which definitely limits the future development of this type
airplane. Such limitation is not desirable in view o the AAF
requirements for extremely high speed aircraft. ...."
Quoted from letter above. / emphasis added]
|
|